"In My Mind, It Was Just Temporary": A Qualitative Study of the Impacts of Cancer on Men and Their Strategies to Cope.

Individuals who are diagnosed and treated for cancer use a variety of strategies to manage its impacts. However, there is currently a lack of research on men's experience with managing cancer impacts, which is necessary to better support them throughout the cancer care continuum. This study explored the experience of men diagnosed with cancer, focusing on the impacts of the illness and its treatment and men's strategies to cope. A qualitative descriptive design was used. Thirty-one men (Mage = 52.7 [26-82] years) diagnosed with various cancer types were recruited to take part in individual telephone interviews (n = 14) or online focus groups (n = 17) addressing the impacts of cancer and strategies they used to cope with these impacts. Directed content analysis was performed, using Fitch's (2008) supportive care framework to guide the analysis. Cancer impacts and strategies used to cope were classified into six categories: physical, psychological, interpersonal, informational, practical, and spiritual. Results indicate that the cancer experience is diverse and multifaceted rather than homogeneous. Medical and supportive care services could be more effectively personalized to meet the diversity of men's needs by adopting a comprehensive and holistic approach to supportive care. Working in partnership with patients, it appears promising to recognize and identify men's needs and match them to appropriate resources to provide truly supportive care.

Barriers and facilitators of supportive care access and use among men with cancer: a qualitative study.

PURPOSE: Men diagnosed with cancer are underrepresented in existing supportive care programming and related research, with preliminary indications that men face unique challenges in accessing and engaging with such services. This study aims to identify barriers and facilitators related to the supportive care service access and use among men diagnosed with cancer. METHODS: From March to May 2021, thirty-one Quebec men (Mage = 52.7, range:(26-82 years) diagnosed with various cancer types were recruited to take part in individual telephone interviews (n = 14) or online focus groups (n = 17) addressing experiences of cancer supportive care services. Content analysis of qualitative data was performed. RESULTS: Barriers and facilitators to men's supportive care access and use were grouped into four categories: (1) alignment between services and men's needs and preferences; (2) delivery of services in an accessible, inclusive, and responsive way; (3) communication and promotion of services in ways that are acceptable, appealing, and attractive to men; and (4) social norms and perceptions of gender and masculinity affecting men's perceptions of and engagement with services. CONCLUSIONS: Barriers and facilitators influencing access and use of supportive care services in men are numerous and diverse. These findings may inform the development of new and the adaptation of current supportive care strategies to better address men's needs and preferences after a cancer diagnosis. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Increased adequacy of services tailored to men's needs and preferences, with an emphasis on supporting men to take an active role in their recovery, could improve access and adherence to care. Services adopting a more integrated, patient-centered, and holistic approach to service delivery could positively impact the cancer care trajectory and health outcomes of men. Larger systemic changes may be needed to support men in engaging in currently existing activities and services.